Footy Tragic
Falling Premium Forwards
There comes a time early in the season, in just about every team, where you regret a few pre-season decisions – you’ve taken a punt on a player who never improved, or you blew your budget to lock in a premium who has so far done less than the player you have sitting on your bench… So round five onwards seems to be the time where you begin to ditch these failed experiments and leaky premiums for greener pastures – you look at players who are averaging 110 points (who you nearly had in your team before round one) and you wish you had enough money to afford them. But then you look a little bit down the list at players already well below their starting price, the players whom other coaches are wishing they didn’t start in their teams. But unlike your dud player, these other players have dropped for a variety of other reasons – an early injury in one game, a really hard tag in another, or possibly the team around them just got off to a really slow start. But the beauty of these players is that you know they are going to come good again – they averaged well over 100 last year, and if it weren’t for a couple of poor games to start 2010, they would be averaging 100 again now. These premium players, who may have already dropped in excess of $50,000 are the types you should be targeting right now – you will be getting them at bargain basement price, and often you are well aware of what you are going to get out of them for the remainder of the season. So this week I will look at two falling premium forwards; Alan Didak and Steve Johnson – historically they are both DT stars, but so far in 2010 they haven’t been any better than average – but lucky for you, I believe things are about to change!
Alan Didak:
Didak started the season with a price of marginally over $450k, but after four weeks he has already lost his owners $59k, meaning he is currently priced at the very affordable $392,400. The reason behind his early season plummet is taggers – whilst in round one against the Dogs Didak player well, scoring a very good 111 points, in round two it was form that was the issue – like most of the Pies, he just couldn’t get into the game (This was when they narrowly defeated the resilient Demons). Weeks three and four, Clint Jones and Gary Moss followed him around the ground, each doing a fair job at curtailing his influence, a fact that could certainly read as either good or bad – good because it is not a form issue behind his low scoring, bad because it is proving that he is the main target of taggers in the Pies lineup. Fortunately though, Didak does have some fairly good support around him to potentially take the pressure off – all of Pendlebury, Swan, Davis and Thomas have the potential to cop the opposition’s number one tagger for the game. If we shoot back 12 months to Didak’s 2009 season, we can see that he didn’t really hit his straps until his 6th game of the season – 127 points against Melbourne. From then until round 22, Didak averaged 110 points, and only dropped below 90 points twice. So he is certainly capable of having some big games, and plenty of them in a row. The fact that Collingwood is only now starting to hit their straps is also an encouraging factor – against both Melbourne and St.Kilda they were very flat and the entire team scored appropriately – so it was not just Dids who copped a low score. Also, his game was actually not too bad – he was well held, but he did show signs that he is not far off his dominant form. So whilst he is often the subject of tagger’s attention, he has proven in the past that he has the workrate (and the team around him) to combat this.
As it stands, Didak has probably one more week until he hits his lowest price – he has a breakeven of 134 points, so at the very best he is still likely to drop down some more – 100 points will see him slashed a further $15,000 or so. At this price, Didak is worth the gamble – he is a great DT player and has the runs on the board to prove it. His team is currently coming out of a rut and into some form which should help carry his average upwards.
Key Stats 2010:
Kick : handball ratio – 1.4 : 1
Average Marks per game: 2.5
Average Goals per game: 1.75
Average Disposals per game: 21.75
Breakeven: 134
Average Dream Team Points: 84
Price: $392,400
Key Stats 2009:
Kick : handball ratio – 2.4 : 1
Average Marks per game: 5.1
Average Goals per game: 1
Average Disposals per game: 25.5
Average Dream Team Points: 103
Steve Johnson:
Stevie J is a notoriously slow starter to the season. In 2008 he averaged 71 points in the first four rounds before averaging 93 for the season, and in 2009 a dry patch from rounds 3 and 6 saw his price drop when he averaged 87 points. Again in 2010, the average for his first four games has been 86 points, forcing his price to drop by $45,000. But his 103 points (thanks to a bag of six goals) in round four is proof that he is coming back into form. Johnson’s issue has not so much been taggers (although he was well held by Broughton in round 3) as it has been fitness. As many coaches would know, Johnson’s 2009 season was cut short at the business end thanks to ongoing issues with his hip – it caused him to miss six of the last nine games and then a large portion of the pre-season. Like many of his teammates, Johnson was put on a very low-grade training program in the off-season to ensure he came into the season well rested. Whilst these sorts of programs can prove effective at preventing injuries, the side-effect is that it will generally take a few weeks for players to get satisfactory match fitness up. Now, Johnson’s few weeks of regaining fitness appear to be up and his six goals on the weekend have gone a long way to proving he is back in touch. The only worry is that he spent very little time venturing upfield to win ball in the midfield – whilst one can assume that this is again related to his fitness, there is the worry that perhaps his hip is hindering more than Geelong would care to let on and therefore there is a chance he could be bound to the forward line for the majority of the year so as to make sure he does not re-injure the hip. When he is up and going, Johnson is brilliant to watch, and scores you plenty of DT points. I am pretty confident that his form (and DT points) will return as his fitness continues to build (and Geelong get on a bit of a role), however a part of me does throw caution to the wind – I am still a bit worried that his hip issue that Geelong say ‘disappeared’ in the off-season may come back to bite both him and the coaches that pick him up in the bottom… Perhaps just be sure to have a trade up your sleeve for the business end of the season…
Key Stats 2010:
Kick : handball ratio – 1.77 : 1
Average Marks per game: 4.75
Average Goals per game: 2.75
Average Disposals per game: 18.75
Breakeven: 118
Average Dream Team Points: 86.25
Price: $391,900
Key Stats 2009:
Kick : handball ratio – 2.5 : 1
Average Marks per game: 6.2
Average Goals per game: 2.22
Average Disposals per game: 20
Average Dream Team Points: 99
9 Comments on Falling Premium Forwards
Liked the article – Didak could indeed be a good pick in a couple of weeks when he bottoms out.
Another one to watch would be Cox (albeit he is a Ruck I know..) when he bottoms out in a week or so (has a breakeven of 106 this week).
Neon Leon is in a similar boat to Johnson and Didak too i reckon. Not exactly sure of the reason on his slow start to the year, other than the couple of flat games that Toby mentioned, but he should be down somewhere around the 370k mark after this week, similar to those 2. Could be worth a look?
Another bloke i am keeping an eye on is Chris Knights. Albeit the Crows are horrible at the moment, they desperately need some inspiration up forward to get some confidence back and this guy could be the one to provide it perhaps?
At the same time, it would be risky picking a forward in a team that is that is playing so poorly.
By the way, is it silly to look at trading out Ballantyne for Sylvia this week considering i’ve only had him for 2 weeks?
Just seems like the more logical way to get Sylvia at the moment without getting rid of Ziebell, but seems like such a wasted trade to get Balla in the first place… hmmm
There’s a few around who are on the edge of the premium bracket, Davis is one of them I think because he has a propensity to be so inconsistent. Robert Murphy has dropped 25K to an intriguing $333k, Lockyer is down to $350k, Fevola is playing as a foil and even though he’s reasonably cheap at $343k it’s a dangerous pick up because if Brown is dominating he’ll not see much of the ball. Roughhead has been steady but seems like he is better with Buddy in the team tacking the number 1 defender. Rioli has yet to explode.
Cant think of any more atm, sure there are others though. Ricky Petterd could be a cracker of a pick up if you get on board early, he’s strong overhead, excellent at reading the play and knowing when to push forward into the hole between midfield and attack to create an outlet or drop deep behind/to stretch the defense. I did say could though, he’s not proven although his last ten or so games have been excellent.
also, thoughts on daisy thomas anyone? apart from the fact that his dream team is looking pretty ace.
Yeah Leon is also worth a look- I prefer didak or Johnson and that’s why I concentraed on them. He does have the potential to score very high, but his consistency worries me. As for knights, I really rate him as a player and in my Adelaide review in the pre-season I rated him the most likely crow to push into the elite bracket… Still a good chance, but Adelaide really need to find form before I’d select him. I’d say they’re not far off, but right now it’s a big risk!!
Didak CAN’T handle the tag – Other teams have seen this and will continue the tag. Unless other team members step up and take the tag off him then I can’t see this changing anytime soon.
I guess that is the fear dlow – so far this year the statement is probably correct, however he did prove last year that 3/4 of the time he could cope, but other times he just cracks the sh*ts and scores poorly…
Wilson, i probably wouldnt recommend trading Ballantyne – was really well held by Baker on the weekend and this was why he scored so poorly. I actually expect he will average better than Ziebell, so i’d probably tell you to hold onto him.
Also worth noting is the likely debut of Cunnington from North this week – the kid is a DT jet and should make an immediate impact. at $144,000 he could be a good downgrade target from any underperforming mid-priced options…
Cheers for the tip Toby. I am also still considering the trade from Wright down to Astbury at the moment, but just weighing up my options with Ziebell, Ballantyne, etc.
It would seem wasteful to get rid of Balla so soon but i guess it comes down to what i feel are my safest options for my 7th forward and 2 bench forwards in order to get Sylvia.
Ideally, i would prefer my last 3 forwards to go: Rockliff (Pods, Hitchcock) – Meaning to get Sylvia, i can only trade Ziebell or Balla for him.
Otherwise, it could look like:
Pods (Hitchcock, Astbury) – Then Danger to Sylvia with ease. But i’m not convinced that either of Astbury or Hitchcock’s futures are as safe as Rockliff and Pods.
Leave a comment on Falling Premium Forwards
You must be logged in to post a comment.
RSS feed for comments on this post · TrackBack URI