Footy Tragic
Round 10
Category: Weekend Wrap-Up · Round: 2010 - Round 10
Essendon vs Western Bulldogs:
Looking Good:
- Paddy Ryder: The Essendon big men are on fire at the moment, with Ryder the main beneficiary this week. Unlike plenty of other ruckmen, his ability to drop forward is a real strength of his game, leading him to not only get plenty of ball around the ground, but also kick a few goals.
- Ben Hudson: Huddo has been in some pretty good form over the past couple of weeks and has a habit of always cutting sick against the Bombers. He is really strong around the ground and in the air, meaning his teammates regularly go to him for the bail-out kick.
- Brent Stanton: After a couple of off weeks, Stanton looked back at his best with a much better game through the middle. He was tagged, yet willed himself through it - and although his disposal still isn’t anything amazing, he gets plenty of it, and at the end of the day that’s all that matters!
Disappointing:
- Jason Akermanis: Looked like he would fit in much better in an EJ Whitten tribute game than in AFL football. Looked slow and emotionally drained. His career looks suddenly headed for the gurgler, so if you have him, now is the time to offload him!
- Nathan Lovett-Murray: After playing some great attacking football through the midfield before his injury, he returned only to be played as a tagger. He was effective, but this role won’t help his dream team ability.
- Ryan Hargrave: After starting the game really well as the loose man, he disappeared from site and did very little for the second half. Inconsistency seems to be his middle name at the moment.
Blip on the Radar:
- Leroy Jetta: Jetta ventured much higher up the field to not only rack up the ball, but also drop forward for some goals. He does look very lively, but does seem very likely to be an inconsistent type. I would want to see another game like this before I brought him in.
Western Bulldogs vs Sydney:
Looking Good:
- Gary Ablett: 32 disposals and a lazy 2 goals whilst resting up forward is beginning to be a standard day at the office for Ablett. He appears to hate negative press, so the more the media slag him off about Gold Coast, the more he appears to prove them wrong.
- Jordan Gysberts: In his debut game for Melbourne he was the highest disposal winner for the club with 26 touches. He played the game beautifully and showed no signs of being star-struck by the stars at Geelong - he went about his business like he’d been doing it for years.
- James Podsiadly: Another five goals from Pods was a brilliant effort from a guy we all paid roundly $77k for only a couple of months ago. I think we just wish he had been playing the game for longer!
Disappointing:
- Jack Watts: After all the big press the kid has gotten this week it was a shame to see him fade away against the Cats. In his defence, he was competing against a very strong Cats backline and therefore had very few chances to score. There is little chance he won’t bounce back.
- Jimmy Bartel: When you look at your team on Friday night and see Geelong vs Melbourne at Skilled Stadium in the wet, there is little hesitation in making Bartel captain, expecting a lazy 130 points from the good man. Unfortunately this was not to be as he was tagged out of the game by Grimes and wasn’t even allowed to junk it up in the last quarter… fair to say he was the reason behind a few eliminated teams this week!
- Austin Wonaeamirri: Still looks like he is regaining fitness from his time on the sidelines. Please remember he was never really a DT star before you get tempted and trade him in for the cash!
Blip on the Radar:
- James Frawley: Has a great knack of marking from opposition kicks, but he rarely ventures far out of his defensive-50. He will get occasional scores like this from kicking around in the backline, but he is not an attacking defender, so is not what you want.
Port Adelaide vs Richmond:
Looking Good:
- Jack Riewoldt: For those that didn’t see this game, it was played in torrential rain and hence a mud-strewn football field - an environment very anti tall players. However, I thought that Riewoldt was once again one of Richmond’s best, kicking 4 goals and laying 7 tackles - great numbers for a guy of his size in this weather!
- Angus Graham: 14 tackles from a ruckman would have to be one of the bigger numbers in a long time. He keeps trying, and looked good as the Tiger’s number one big guy.
- Matthew Broadbent: First game for the season and looked composed. He has put some muscle on his body and looks to fit in well, running out of defence. He will get better in cleaner conditions, but he would be one of the few Port positives from this game.
Disappointing:
- David Rodan: Lacked the ability to inject much magic into the match thanks to the mud that kept bogging him down.
- Jeromey Webberley: Seemed to always be one step behind the ball and appeared nowhere near it in the second half. In only his fourth game, he shouldn’t worry about his near future in the side.
- Danyle Pearce: Was again tagged out of the match, but the weather wasn’t kind to a player who relies on his pace. Has been down a couple of weeks now which is a worry.
Blip on the Radar:
- Josh Carr: He would have licked his lips when he saw the weather forecast for this game. Carr is a hard-nosed midfielder, normally assigned tagging jobs, but he seemed to be given more of an attacking license in this game due to the conditions suiting him - don’t look for too much more of this in the future.
Brisbane vs Collingwood:
Looking Good:
- Luke Power: Creamed Collingwood through the middle in his 250th match. He doesn’t play at all like his age (in a good way) and is appearing in some pretty good form. Could be a pretty good alternative pick for your midfield.
- Dale Thomas: I think this is his highest DT score ever, further proving that 2010 is his breakout year. He finished the game with 34 disposals and 12 marks, playing exclusively as a midfielder. Possibly a bit expensive now, but is looking like a good consistent option for once!
- Ash McGrath: As predicted in my Tuesday article (blowing my own horn? Never!), McGrath’s rebounding role continued in very good fashion this week. He ran off the backline and minded Beams as he drifted forward.
Disappointing:
- Heath Shaw: STILL cannot handle a tag! Brisbane rotated men through him and he had no way of getting away. His highs can be fantastic, but Shaw is one of the most inconsistent dream teamers in the league!
- Dayne Beams: Beams has been in ripping form over the past few weeks, but was totally shut down by McGrath. Expect him to bounce back, but games like this should be expected with him playing more forward of centre.
- Brendan Fevola: Was well held by Presti in the first half, but when he moved further upfield to CHF he looked a lot better. 4 late goals saved his owners complete heartache, but his injury is clearly playing a part in his poor form.
Blip on the Radar:
- Brent Staker: Played plenty of kick-to-kick deep in the Brisbane backline, bellying his score. Brisbane love to over-possess the ball down back, but Staker is not a regular there, he is typically a forward. He has shown some good form this year, but he hasn’t enough improvement in him to be a worthwhile cash cow.
St.Kilda vs Adelaide:
Looking Good:
- Leigh Montagna: Was sublime all game, kicking five brilliant goals amongst his 38 possessions. He has an amazing ability to find space and deliver the ball into the forward line, causing him to be given so much of the ball by his teammates. He is still very cheap for what he offers, so strongly consider!
- Richard Douglas: Douglas was easily the best Crow and set up plenty of their attacks from the midfield. Seven tackles highlighted his effort. I have been very critical of Douglas over the journey, but he could prove to be the Bernie Vince of 2010.
- Sam Fisher: Ahem… As some Tuesday article suggested, Fisher’s return to the backline repaid with some great scoring. He got 12 disposals in the first term alone and went on to finish with 30. He takes plenty of marks and constantly rotates with Gilbert as the loose man.
Disappointing:
- Andrew McLeod: Shut down by Baker, a strong nemesis from years gone by. He saw very little of the ball (maybe he was emotional about the retiring of his good friend Tyson Edwards), but to his credit he did come into the game under an injury cloud.
- Justin Koschitzke: The delivery wasn’t amazing to Kosi, but he didn’t help himself by continually leading to the wrong spots and dropping marks. Looks bereft of confidence and perhaps needs a run in the ruck to wake him up.
- Taylor Walker: I actually hadn’t even realised Walker was playing until I saw his name on the goals sheet. Was well held by Blake and Gwilt, but did very little to work through this.
Blip on the Radar:
- Steven Baker: Nowadays, Baker is typically a stay-home defender, playing on the opponent’s best small forwards. However, he moved into the midfield for this game to play on McLeod - a player he has a fantastic history on. This happens VERY rarely, so these sorts of scores are not to be expected.
Hawthorn vs Sydney:
Looking Good:
- Dan Hannebery: Those who have already given the Rising Star to Naitanui have clearly not watched any Sydney games! This kid showed some great signs last year and is already following through with his promises in spades this year! Played another best-on-ground performance with 25 disposals and 3 goals.
- Jordan Lewis: One of Hawthorn’s more consistent players (They seemed to share the load very evenly) - he has really bounced back since his dropping a few weeks ago - in fact, he hasn’t scored under 100 since!
- Shane Mumford: Mummy smashed Renouf in the ruck with 42 hitouts to 16 in a dominant display. He is also working very hard around the ground, racking up 17 disposals - I’m sure Geelong would wish their time over again with him!
Disappointing:
- Jarryd Roughead: Kicked no goals, again looking very uninterested. Hawthorn are just lucky that Buddy was able to step up in his place!
- Matt O’Dwyer: O’Dwyer was recalled to the seniors after a whopping 54 disposals last week in the reserves. Unfortunately, 11 touches was a little below par.
- Ryan O’Keefe: Played the entire game as a forward - a very worrying sign. Whilst O’Keefe used to be a good dream teamer as a forward, his days as a midfielder are much much better! Whether this is permanent, or he is just resting an injury will be a hotly discussed question this week!
Blip on the Radar:
- ?: I looked through this list and couldn’t find one high score where I thought “yeah… that’s not gonna happen again.” Let me know if you think otherwise!
Carlton vs West Coast:
Looking Good:
- Bryce Gibbs: Dominated off half-back with a whopping 45 possessions and 12 marks! This is what we want to see from Gibbs more often - his disposal was amazing, so it is no wonder Carlton are playing him behind the ball - he just needs to consistently deliver now!
- Chris Judd: Once again Judd proved untaggable and also a very good DT prospect in the process. He does enjoy beating up of his old side and this game was no exception. Various players were rotated through him, yet none seemed capable of slowing him down.
- Marc Murphy: 36 disposals seemed like nothing compared to Gibbs, but Murphy was just as impressive - despite an attempted tag, he still got the ball at will and laid 5 tackles in the process. The Blue boys are all looking like very good prospects at the moment.
Disappointing:
- Andrew Carrazzo: As the worry tends to be with Carrazzo, he was moved into the forward line for a tagging role and it in turn killed his scoring output. Whilst I’d like to say this is a one off, he does seem to be a player regularly thrown into different positions - some great of DT, and others just rubbish.
- Brad Ebert: Has been in super form this year, but just couldn’t get into this game, finishing with a measly 13 disposals.
- Scott Selwood: Was running though the midfield as a tagger, but didn’t bother trying to get it himself. He is apparently capable as a ball-winner, although we are yet to see it at AFL level.
Blip on the Radar:
- Jeff Garlett: Small forwards like Garlett are notoriously inconsistent. In free-flowing open games like this one, he will dominate. But put him into an ugly slog of a game and he will be lucky to make 50 points.
Fremantle vs North Melbourne:
Looking Good:
- Paul Duffield: Started slow, but as usual plenty of passages involving 4 or 5 disposals saw him become the highest scorer on the ground. He does know how to get into space beautifully, often seeing him part of Freo’s kick-to-kick sessions.
- Nathan Fyfe: This kid is unreal - he looks like a 15 year old boy, but plays with incredible maturity and flair! He was everywhere in the third quarter and ended up racking up 27 disposals and 3 goals for the game.
- Kepler Bradley: Maybe, just maybe this could be Bradley’s year. He has played three games so far and all have been impressive, although none as much as this one. He booted four goals as a forward and floated though the midfield as the second ruckman in parts too. As odd as it sounds - consider him.
Disappointing:
- Brent Harvey: He did get injured, however it wasn’t until ¾ time that he was off the field. Was well tagged by Van Berlo and had no effect on the game.
- Chris Mayne: He seemed to spend the game just floating around the packs, not actually touching the ball himself. Kicked a couple of goals, but it didn’t get much more exciting than that for the man with the giant schnoz.
- Michael Barlow: His late withdrawal saw over 160,000 dream team coaches seeing red. But let’s be honest - being the most un-unique player in the competition, it didn’t have too much effect anyway.
Blip on the Radar:
- Nathan Grima: Played a key defensive role on Pavlich, but was able to zone off thanks to Pav’s time in the middle. It meant for plenty of cheap ball he wouldn’t really get otherwise.
Category: Weekend Wrap-Up · Round: 2010 - Round 10

Posts RSS feed
Facebook
Flickr
Twitter
29 Comments on Round 10
Michael Barlow missed with a minor hamstring complaint.
My understanding is that Fremantle were being conservative with him and he is expected to play this week.
If anyone cares, this week was my most disappointing week ever.
My backline was sh*te, with Shaw, Enright, Mackie, Hodge and Carrazzo all failing to crack a ton. Phil Davis scored more than Heath Shaw! I thought he was over his “I can’t break a forward tag” days. Serves me right.
My midfield underperformed it’s average by around 120 points, with Bartel, Boyd and Barlow all down. The fact that I stayed with Jimmy as captain when I had Dane in the wings killed me (as well as many others I’m sure…)
My Forward Line, which has been irreparably rubbish for most of the year (averaging 553 all year - a high of 689 and a low of 512, which was THIS week) continued to disappoint, with a Davis replacement, Gia, O’Keefe, Gumby and Goodes all under performing.
Absolute Poo.
I lost 2,650 ranking places.
Worst. Score. Ever.
Bartel nearly killed me as Captain, thankfully solid performances from others (Daisy Thomas and Duffield) *just* got me over the line by 5 points.
Working on a two-way trade next week to finally get Ablett. Hopefully he drops a couple of grand this week!
the ft league is ranked 217th overall. pretty good effort!
I really like Leroy Jetta, not 100% sure he’d be a blip. Consistency will probably be a problem with him and it would be unusual to be trading someone of his price point in at this stage, but I reckon he could pull a few more of those scores.
The other footytragic league is ranked 32 overall. Even with my sh*thouse score included!
Is it too late to jump on Lenny? …
Bartel as Captain lost me one of my League matches (against the bottom team in the League!) by 7 miserable points - I could’ve had 12 other players as Captain and would’ve won. Not happy… At least I still got an ‘OK’ score of 1992 and ‘only’ fell 500+/- in the overall rankings, so while not a great week, it could have been a whole lot worse.
Am considering both Ablett and Chapman this week - but think they’ve both got further to fall price wise, so might sit tight again…
I’ve been dreading when carrazzo’s tagging would affect his score, sadly I can see this happening quite a few more times this year, cost me this week (inconjunction with bartel captain) to crash out of eliminator. So here’s my dilemma, either I get montagna this week for a double trade or I wait a week and get gablett for three trades.
Yeah bartel ruined my weekend too… Mind you, the inconsistency of my forward line is beginning to really piss me off! Two trades will get me ablett thus week, but I plan to wait another week, meaning I will likely save $50k in the move. Trengrove’s recent form for port is a real positive and the main reason I can do it!
Wison, never to late to get a guy like Hayes- he may not be at bargain price anymore, but he is still going to score consistent and high regardless. You pay big bucks for him for a reason! Joker, montagna a good choice, as is ablett tho. Keep an eye on Joey tho as he actually played the game carrying an injury believe it or not! I’d be surprised if he missed tho!
My next stupid question: Would it be too ridiculous to consider getting on Lenny for Barlow, even if Barlow is back?
My reasons being: 161,307 people have Barlow. As great as he’s been, he is not unique in any way. Whereas 19,521 have Hayes. Much more unique!
The thing is i am sick of not having a “Lock” Captain, ie. Ablett, Swan. And have been totally murdered by the likes of Bartel and Boyd this year. The 2 blokes i thought i could rely on all year long! (Have had Jimmy for every one of his scores under 100 and 2 of Boyd’s!) Have jagged a couple of their nice scores, but for the most part it’s been nothing but heartache from my Captains this year! All the while watching every one of my opponents coast thru with their Ablett or Swans as Captain week in, week out!
Yes, Barlow is basically now a keeper, but to gain any ground on my league opponents, i feel i need to do something drastic and a move like this almost seems justified.
Am i tripping balls here boys, or would does it makes some sort of sense??
I’d advise against trading barlow, surely a Waste and the trade better used To upgrade elsewhere or saved for an injury. Toby, more/all information on joeys injury please. Was it an in match injury or did he come intothe game carrying it, a knock, a strain, a degenate groin!?! Is that why he started at half forward? Would be greatly appreciated to help decide my final midfielder.
Toby
Im not sure what your reasoning is behind a player like Ablett when there are players such as Montagna about 50k cheaper and will most likely play 22 games. This is actually my dilemma lol
Ablett without doubt will miss games this year, and at the intensity he is playing, is quite injury prone. Both players will most likely score about the same, maybe Ablett slightly more.
Just would like your reasoning as to why Ablett takes your final midfield spot over Montagna?
I have been planing on getting Ablett this week, but now as CTB brings up why not montagna or someone else that is cheaper. Judd is also looking good as well.
Wilson, i think that would be a good idea to trade out Barlow to become more unique but i would be waiting a bit longer for Barlow price to flatten out. I think i may do this in the coming weeks just to become more unique.
I was also thinking about trading Heath Shaw to a different player maybe Sam Fisher. Do you think this is a good idea?
Picked up juddy a couple weeks ago, very happy.
He is even closer to his best form ever this year, his pace has lifted a notch and he is shaking the tags with, well ease. Clubs are also opting to tag Murph over Judd as well.
Trading Barlow is a waste of a trade. Unless he gets injured or his form disappears, do not bother.
In essence, i understand that it does sound like a wasteful trade, but in the lack of a real hit-up, week-to-week 100+ Captain, do you get where i’m coming from?
I’m just saying that i’m finding it frustrating that i’m kind of experimenting week to week with Captains and it’s doing my head in. I have fallen from 2nd to 9th in my league mainly due to poor Captain choices!
I know there’s hundreds of variables but having a reliable Captain is very pertinent to a successful and consistent team in my opinion.
@Wilson
I think that just reinterates how important it was to start off with 1 of Swan and Ablett (and you could say Montagna) in the midfield. Definitely agree on your point having a reliable captain. While boyd was going to step up this year he was never going to lift to 110ppg. You got him for the reason that he was consistent and i guess with consistency you need to pay the price. If Barlow is your weakest mid, your doing pretty well.
I think there’s such a push for teams to be ‘unique’ - i got burnt twice in brennan and sylvia for being unique when i should have gone for the more conventional trades of pavlich and goodes. Gablett, Chapman and Goddard are popular for a reason.
Wilson, I don’t see that trading out Barlow is such a bad thing. I doubt there would be anyone that started with Barlow from Round 1 who considered he would be a keeper - I know I didn’t. Therefore everyone would have allowed at least one trade to upgrade him sometime in the season.
The comments about being a wasted trade are probably referring to it not being a ‘required’ trade anymore, more a luxury trade. Therefore if you allowed yourself a trade when building your team, I don’t see anything wrong with doing it. That said, keeping him allows you to use that trade elsewhere.
The big consideration is when to pull the trigger as he still has a fair way to go before he reaches his peak. I guess it comes down to when your trade target (Ablett/Swan) bottoms out.
I hope that made sense and helped.
I can agree with the reasoning to trade out Barlow Greg. I understand that a certain amount of trades were set aside for upgrades but there is also an amount set aside for injuries which more often then not isnt enough. Looking at it right now Barlow is averaging 105 whilst swan is average 115. If you do the math, say we traded out Barlow this week, the net point gain would be 10*12= 120 points over the season, costing rougly 100k. With 100k, this week you could upgrade maguire avg 75 for gilbert who avg 100, actually that costs 110k but still. Net point gain 25*12= 300 points over the season. I understand my example is just that, an example which may have no relevance to the situation but it still shows how the trade could be better used elsewhere.
I can’t agree**
Thanks guys, your input is very much appreciated. I do see pros and cons for both sides of the argument which makes it very tough, but great food for thought. (as we love to say on this site!) ;)
The “popular vs. unique” argument will go on forever i think. I guess i tend to swing on the unique side a bit more when picking my team but by the same token i can see why popular players are popular. If you at your field of players and take away the names on the screen, for example (Ablett, Swan etc.) and you’re still getting 120-140 from them, regardless of who it is and regardless of the fact that 160,000 other people might have that player, too.
Greg, to give you a brief idea, i have 10 trades left and envisage 1 more forward upgrade and 1 potentially 2 more defender upgrades. So calculating that i would have to double-trade along the way, i would really only be leaving myself 4-5 trades for injuries, which is a little worrying.
The Barlow trade would definitely be a luxury trade, and not entirely necessary. More like a frustration trade, if you like! ;)
So if i can get my team into a good position come finals and can spare a trade or 2, i don’t see the Barlow trade as a bad thing either.
Wilson, i think this is really interesting discussion topic - personally i am of the opinion that it is a luxury trade and not particularly necessary, however i will elaborate why…
Whist yes, when you started the year, Barlow was not anticipated to be a mid-range keeper, but the fact he is has become a huge bonus. One of my biggest mistakes in season 2007 was trading out Matt Priddis (in his breakout year) in the second half of the year, just because i always saw him as a rookie who just scored well. I figured that i would prefer to bring in an elite midfielder with the pick who i could rely upon for greater consistency- i trusted in Scott West who broke down a couple of weeks later. Priddis went on to finish the season with two scores above 150 and averaged well over 100 - scores i would have loved in my side regardless of how many people had him.
Barlow, regardless of how many people have him is going to average you (a likely) 100 points a game - there are not too many other mids who are going to give you this. It is like thinking of getting rid of Ablett, Goddard or Hodge, all because they are in more than half of the teams in the competition. And whilst i can understand your thoughts, you must remember that you have 21 other players in your team - 100 points per week from Barlow is great, and perhaps you should look to other positions to get your ‘edge.’ Who are your other mids? Do you have any mid-priced underperformers you can offload?
My second suggestion, if you are still very keen to get rid of him, is perhaps waiting a few weeks. If you look likely of getting into your league finals (and having Barlow certainly won’t work against you here!), this may be the time to consider a different option. Around this time you will know how many injuries you have and how many trades are remaining - this is where you can be a bit more creative and adventurous to get that edge over your opposition. This is where you look at the other 7 teams in your top eight and establish who they have and what premiums they are missing. There may be a chance only 3 of them have Ablett, perhaps Montagna is in only one. Here is where you can then choose the best fit for your team (if trading Barlow is still an option) and using it much more to your advantage. Getting rid of him now won’t change much in the short-term (possibly the difference of 10-20 points a game, which isn’t much!), but perhaps trading him when all the cards are on the table could be a much more calculated move with much better results! Plus, who’s to say that one of your other midfielders doesn’t go down in the next couple of weeks? These things happen!
Hope this helps!!
this may be frustrating for the sandilands coaches out there…(M.Harvey @ afl.com.au)
“Sandilands had 36 hit-outs and kicked a goal in Sunday’s clash, but the ruckman had minimal impact around the ground, finishing with 10 possessions.
Harvey said he was aiming to decrease the star big man’s workload. “We’ve been doing that, sort of getting his game time to around 90 per cent. It was up around 98 per cent,” he said. “We’re slowly getting that down. Ideally we’d get that down to 80-85.
“(But) we’ve got a young team that needs a guy like him out there as much as we can.”
I really hope he starts killing the possessions then if he is going to see less game time.
Thanks Toby, i think over the course of some heavy thought today and reading everyones valued input, i think doing the Barlow trade this soon would be very much unnecessary.
I finalised my midfield a few weeks ago and was very happy with it at the time, but am now having second-thoughts. Which i guess is what’s prompting me to consider trades such as this.
My mids are, as you asked: Bartel, Boyd, Pendles, Murphy, Gibbs, Barlow.
I picked Bartel and Boyd for their mandatory 100-110 points every week and started Pendles and Murphy with the premise that they could lift their averages to around that mark, also. Gibbs was the final addition to my midfield.
In hindsight, i would’ve much preferred to have started say, Ablett/Swan instead of Bartel and picked a mid-pricer for improvement instead of Murphy, leaving myself potentially 2 or 3 midfield upgrades throughout the year, instead of 1. (Baring in mind Barlow was never picked as a keeper, obviously)
Like you said though, there are 21 other players in my side and i think i will now sensibly shift my attention to upgrading one of Ziebell, Waters or Maguire to a premium this week.
Once again, thanks for your input guys!
In general, I’m not as keen on this whole ‘unique’ thing. What’s the point in being unique if you’re missing out on the best? It’d be unique to not have Pods, but it would also be detrimental.
Barlow won’t score in the top six mids, but trading him out because not having him would be unique makes no sense to me. It’s always good when you nail an uncommon selection, and I’m prone to those in my starting squad, but I can never get me head around unique for the sake of unique. You can gain 1000 points by chipping away less than 85 points per week on any team, so I don’t see why you’d need to be unique for the sake of unique. That’s completely achievable with a team full of common selections, because by sheer force of mathematics there isn’t a huge chance your team will be the same as those you’re chasing.
It wasn’t just about being unique for the sake of being unique, it was seeing the benefits, if any, in having an edge over my opponents in doing such a trade and more so, having a lock-away captain for the year.
I was a bit behind on the discussion. I was referring to your very first post on the topic, where you were quoting stats about how many teams Barlow is in.
If you’re worried about a captain option, don’t trade Barlow out. Make him captain. I reckon there’s crazier things you could try, if you’re not happy with what you’ve got and can’t afford those premium captain choices.
Yeah, like i said, it was more of a “frustrated” idea than anything. I was thinking along very desperate lines and just dummy-spitting basically, because of my horrible year for Captain selections so far. Though i’m sure i’m not the only one that’s had a shocking run.
So with no Ablett or Swan, i’ll just need to back the cattle i’ve got and hope they can improve from here on in i guess. Barlow isn’t a bad Captain choice, though i haven’t had the coconuts to give him the ‘C’ yet. :)
Might start looking outside of the midfield a bit and start considering blokes like Hodge or Didak that have been pretty consistent thus far, and are capable of whopping scores.
Leave a comment on Round 10
You must be logged in to post a comment.
RSS feed for comments on this post · TrackBack URI