<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Article #1 - Positional Advice</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.footytragic.com/blog/tuneys-tuition/tuneys-tuition-positional-advice/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.footytragic.com/blog/tuneys-tuition/tuneys-tuition-positional-advice/</link>
	<description>'the site dreamteam experts don't want you to see'</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 08 Sep 2010 11:25:35 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Dan</title>
		<link>http://www.footytragic.com/blog/tuneys-tuition/tuneys-tuition-positional-advice/comment-page-1/#comment-641</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jan 2010 01:09:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.footytragic.com/?p=1079#comment-641</guid>
		<description>Ordinarily I would agree, but there's some new rules this year that look like it will be beneficial to pick dual eligible players in the midfield.

I've read a bit about this new rule that will allow you to sub dual eligible players into their other position. I *think* the catch is that you have to have a matching player to swap out. You can potentially avoid a 0 by having a "matching pair".

For example, if you pick Col Sylvia (C/F) in the midfield and Shaun Higgins (C/F) in the forward line, if Higgo is out injured and you have plenty of coverage in the middle you can either maximise your points in the forward line by playing a stud like Sylvia.

I haven't got my head around the new rule properly yet, but it looks like it could be beneficial to have matching pairs across a few positions this year to cover 0's of maximise points in a certain position.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ordinarily I would agree, but there&#8217;s some new rules this year that look like it will be beneficial to pick dual eligible players in the midfield.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve read a bit about this new rule that will allow you to sub dual eligible players into their other position. I *think* the catch is that you have to have a matching player to swap out. You can potentially avoid a 0 by having a &#8220;matching pair&#8221;.</p>
<p>For example, if you pick Col Sylvia (C/F) in the midfield and Shaun Higgins (C/F) in the forward line, if Higgo is out injured and you have plenty of coverage in the middle you can either maximise your points in the forward line by playing a stud like Sylvia.</p>
<p>I haven&#8217;t got my head around the new rule properly yet, but it looks like it could be beneficial to have matching pairs across a few positions this year to cover 0&#8217;s of maximise points in a certain position.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
