<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Brad Sheppard</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.footytragic.com/blog/dans-draftees/brad-sheppard/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.footytragic.com/blog/dans-draftees/brad-sheppard/</link>
	<description>Tragically obsessed with AFL Dream Team &#38; SuperCoach</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 04:53:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: dlow75</title>
		<link>http://www.footytragic.com/blog/dans-draftees/brad-sheppard/comment-page-1/#comment-690</link>
		<dc:creator>dlow75</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Feb 2010 05:04:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.footytragic.com/?p=1124#comment-690</guid>
		<description>Dan

I&#039;m thinking that the best way to use this tactic is to name someone like Didak/Pavlich Carazzo/Hogde combos and then latter on in the year you could down grade a cash cow or injured player to a multi position rookie and then have the rookie sit on the midfield bench and have these guys sit in the backs or forwards

Problem being you might be down grading to a rookie that probably won&#039;t be your first choice rookie.

On the flip side if one of these multi position players gets injured then you could pick up a rookie from either position.

Dan you might have a point there about Didak - If we pick him up hes going to be a keeper - I if he plays in the midfield he&#039;s going to be just as good as anyone else in his price range - and is going to add a degree of flexability to your team as well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dan</p>
<p>I&#8217;m thinking that the best way to use this tactic is to name someone like Didak/Pavlich Carazzo/Hogde combos and then latter on in the year you could down grade a cash cow or injured player to a multi position rookie and then have the rookie sit on the midfield bench and have these guys sit in the backs or forwards</p>
<p>Problem being you might be down grading to a rookie that probably won&#8217;t be your first choice rookie.</p>
<p>On the flip side if one of these multi position players gets injured then you could pick up a rookie from either position.</p>
<p>Dan you might have a point there about Didak &#8211; If we pick him up hes going to be a keeper &#8211; I if he plays in the midfield he&#8217;s going to be just as good as anyone else in his price range &#8211; and is going to add a degree of flexability to your team as well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan</title>
		<link>http://www.footytragic.com/blog/dans-draftees/brad-sheppard/comment-page-1/#comment-689</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2010 13:22:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.footytragic.com/?p=1124#comment-689</guid>
		<description>I won&#039;t be talking everyone up like the first two! Only Trengove. It&#039;s a bit fanciful looking for rookies to be keepers. If there&#039;s a freak that comes along and can pull it off, then that&#039;s awesome, but otherwise they&#039;re either going to make you some money by the time you sell, or be cover by the end of the year.

I don&#039;t think it would be robbing my centres to get a player who can average 100+ even if he is eligible in another position. To use your example dlow, what&#039;s to say Didak won&#039;t outscore whatever other premium I would&#039;ve got in his place? I&#039;m still trying to get my head around the best tactic to use with this new rule, but at this stage I won&#039;t hesitate to name a F/C or B/C in my midfield.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I won&#8217;t be talking everyone up like the first two! Only Trengove. It&#8217;s a bit fanciful looking for rookies to be keepers. If there&#8217;s a freak that comes along and can pull it off, then that&#8217;s awesome, but otherwise they&#8217;re either going to make you some money by the time you sell, or be cover by the end of the year.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t think it would be robbing my centres to get a player who can average 100+ even if he is eligible in another position. To use your example dlow, what&#8217;s to say Didak won&#8217;t outscore whatever other premium I would&#8217;ve got in his place? I&#8217;m still trying to get my head around the best tactic to use with this new rule, but at this stage I won&#8217;t hesitate to name a F/C or B/C in my midfield.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Toby</title>
		<link>http://www.footytragic.com/blog/dans-draftees/brad-sheppard/comment-page-1/#comment-688</link>
		<dc:creator>Toby</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2010 10:27:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.footytragic.com/?p=1124#comment-688</guid>
		<description>Well dan has seven more kids to review, so just see how u go saying no to most of them with his convincing skills!! Haha</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well dan has seven more kids to review, so just see how u go saying no to most of them with his convincing skills!! Haha</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dlow75</title>
		<link>http://www.footytragic.com/blog/dans-draftees/brad-sheppard/comment-page-1/#comment-685</link>
		<dc:creator>dlow75</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2010 09:25:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.footytragic.com/?p=1124#comment-685</guid>
		<description>Really how many rookie keepers are there anyway in all positions. Happy to pick up any rookie that is going to play the first 6 games with an average over 50</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Really how many rookie keepers are there anyway in all positions. Happy to pick up any rookie that is going to play the first 6 games with an average over 50</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Toby</title>
		<link>http://www.footytragic.com/blog/dans-draftees/brad-sheppard/comment-page-1/#comment-684</link>
		<dc:creator>Toby</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2010 09:18:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.footytragic.com/?p=1124#comment-684</guid>
		<description>The main way I&#039;m looking at using this rule is with tippett in forward and lobbe in ruck... If warnock doesn&#039;t come on as second ruck, I&#039;ll move Tippett across...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The main way I&#8217;m looking at using this rule is with tippett in forward and lobbe in ruck&#8230; If warnock doesn&#8217;t come on as second ruck, I&#8217;ll move Tippett across&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dlow75</title>
		<link>http://www.footytragic.com/blog/dans-draftees/brad-sheppard/comment-page-1/#comment-683</link>
		<dc:creator>dlow75</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2010 09:15:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.footytragic.com/?p=1124#comment-683</guid>
		<description>Dan

If you go of multi positional players ctr/fwd then your compromising your centres if you decide to play someone like didak in the centres then your going to give up getting an extra premium, got to weight it up against using an extra trade, well worth a though at least</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dan</p>
<p>If you go of multi positional players ctr/fwd then your compromising your centres if you decide to play someone like didak in the centres then your going to give up getting an extra premium, got to weight it up against using an extra trade, well worth a though at least</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan</title>
		<link>http://www.footytragic.com/blog/dans-draftees/brad-sheppard/comment-page-1/#comment-682</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2010 07:12:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.footytragic.com/?p=1124#comment-682</guid>
		<description>In hindsight Broughton could have been a rookie keeper if he played all season. I definitely would&#039;ve had him on my bench from the start if he was named Round 1, because I was a big fan. But even then I wouldn&#039;t have been planning on him being a keeper. That sort of thing is just a massive bonus.

Dlow, consider playing around with this multi position rule to cover for those sort of guys. I&#039;m playing around with structures that gives me a bit of slack to have injury prone players if I have a matching pair in another position.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In hindsight Broughton could have been a rookie keeper if he played all season. I definitely would&#8217;ve had him on my bench from the start if he was named Round 1, because I was a big fan. But even then I wouldn&#8217;t have been planning on him being a keeper. That sort of thing is just a massive bonus.</p>
<p>Dlow, consider playing around with this multi position rule to cover for those sort of guys. I&#8217;m playing around with structures that gives me a bit of slack to have injury prone players if I have a matching pair in another position.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dlow75</title>
		<link>http://www.footytragic.com/blog/dans-draftees/brad-sheppard/comment-page-1/#comment-680</link>
		<dc:creator>dlow75</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2010 03:09:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.footytragic.com/?p=1124#comment-680</guid>
		<description>Not going to risk starting any rookies in the backline - Got Hunt and Kennelly with the view that Kennelly could become a keeper.  Might risk one rookie in the forward line.  Because the value rookies are in the midfield I&#039;m 90% sure that I&#039;ll be only starting 2 rookie centres only this year.

Trangrove and Martin

PS what do guys think about Higgins - I really don&#039;t want this guy to be in my side.  He is a real injury risk and I&#039;m not convinced that his upside is enough to cover for his injury risk.  Hes looking like a Chapman tpe of player.  Another in the same boat would be Rioli, Ellis.

Whats Sivlia&#039;s injury history been like?

I&#039;m going to try and weed some of these players out of my side so I possibly can save a trade or 2 during the season, especially at the start of the season when I don&#039;t have any cash to upgrade to a premium.  No sideways trades hopefully.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not going to risk starting any rookies in the backline &#8211; Got Hunt and Kennelly with the view that Kennelly could become a keeper.  Might risk one rookie in the forward line.  Because the value rookies are in the midfield I&#8217;m 90% sure that I&#8217;ll be only starting 2 rookie centres only this year.</p>
<p>Trangrove and Martin</p>
<p>PS what do guys think about Higgins &#8211; I really don&#8217;t want this guy to be in my side.  He is a real injury risk and I&#8217;m not convinced that his upside is enough to cover for his injury risk.  Hes looking like a Chapman tpe of player.  Another in the same boat would be Rioli, Ellis.</p>
<p>Whats Sivlia&#8217;s injury history been like?</p>
<p>I&#8217;m going to try and weed some of these players out of my side so I possibly can save a trade or 2 during the season, especially at the start of the season when I don&#8217;t have any cash to upgrade to a premium.  No sideways trades hopefully.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Toby</title>
		<link>http://www.footytragic.com/blog/dans-draftees/brad-sheppard/comment-page-1/#comment-679</link>
		<dc:creator>Toby</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2010 02:54:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.footytragic.com/?p=1124#comment-679</guid>
		<description>Davies should be very highly considered - he could slip straight into the role vacated by Nick Stevens - a very potent fantasy position!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Davies should be very highly considered &#8211; he could slip straight into the role vacated by Nick Stevens &#8211; a very potent fantasy position!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: murphinator</title>
		<link>http://www.footytragic.com/blog/dans-draftees/brad-sheppard/comment-page-1/#comment-678</link>
		<dc:creator>murphinator</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2010 02:19:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.footytragic.com/?p=1124#comment-678</guid>
		<description>Broughton is the closest to a starting rookie keeper as i can remember (in the backs).  If it wasn&#039;t for his ankle(?) injuries at the start of the season he would have been very close to a full year player rookie keeper.

How do you think Davies for Carlton will go this year? Strong bodied, 94k first year defender? Perhaps not too enough opportunity?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Broughton is the closest to a starting rookie keeper as i can remember (in the backs).  If it wasn&#8217;t for his ankle(?) injuries at the start of the season he would have been very close to a full year player rookie keeper.</p>
<p>How do you think Davies for Carlton will go this year? Strong bodied, 94k first year defender? Perhaps not too enough opportunity?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

