Footy Tragic
Plenty On The Bubble…
So as I was explaining last week, this article will look at players that are set to go bang. Generally I’ll have a look a couple of falling premiums, maybe try and explain why their scoring has been below par, find some stats to indicate they’re on the way back up etc. However, I’m also committed to using this article to write a brief description of all rookie priced players who are on the verge of their first price rise.
This week there are SEVEN players on the bubble, so forgive me for not writing about a premium this week, I’ve got seven rookies to write about so there’s plenty of reading material for you to go on with. FWIW, Dean Cox is the most intriguing premium. He’ll still be relevant to write about next week, but his break even this week of 106 this week is actually achievable, so this could be as cheap as Cox will be this season. Pending a good game this week I’ll be taking a very close look at him next week when there are far less rookies about to soar in price…
Chris Schmidt – Adelaide ($94,500 DEF, Break even: -71)
First two games: 81 vs. Melbourne (L), 60 vs. Carlton (L) = 70.5 avg.
The rookie listed Crow hasn’t been too bad in his first couple of games. To be “not too bad” is basically like being in the Top 5 at the Crows the way they’re going this year. His spot in the team should be pretty safe for a few weeks with so many Crows playing so badly. For a rookie back his scoring potential isn’t really a problem, he fits the bill there, but long term I’d be more worried about his job security, which as I mentioned seems pretty solid for now. He’s not a super kick of the ball, so as the Crows start getting guys back from injury I wonder if his kicking will come under the microscope from match committee. Mind you, that’s more of a general comment about his game – his kicking has been fine in his two games so far.
Tom Rockliff – Brisbane ($101,100 FWD, Break even: -91)
First two games: 87 vs. Port (W), 78 vs. Bulldogs (W) = 82.5 avg
My love for him is well and truly on the record. I love the way he’s been able to find space on the wing so far in his first two games of the season. For a bloke who was always knocked for having poor fitness, he’s working pretty damn hard. It’s obviously been a big improvement in his game. He’s a very smart footballer with the capability of racking up good numbers. Job security could be an issue down the track, but with his current form he demands selection and will make good money quickly. If the Lions have a few more guys pushing into their midfield, Rockliff could keep his spot in the team as a forward too.
Kane Lucas – Carlton ($113,500 MID, Break even: -77)
First two games: 67 vs. Essendon (L), 93 vs. Adelaide (W) = 80 avg.
He managed good numbers in his first game against Essendon, but didn’t really look that good IMO. A much better performance against admittedly pedestrian opposition last week and he almost snagged a ton! He’s a little pricier than most of midfield rookies at $113K. I’m a bit of a fan of his and honestly there’s nothing intuitive about this next comment, but I just kind of get the feeling he might take a little bit of time to consistently be a good scorer at AFL level. It’s more of a hunch than anything, but if your hunch makes you think the other way, then good luck.
Travis Colyer – Essendon ($89,500 MID, Break even: -75)
First two games: 68 vs. Carlton (W), 73 vs. West Coast (L) = 70.5 avg.
Pacy outside player with a reasonably one way game and questionable kicking skills – sounds like someone Knights would play. That sounds a lot harsher on Colyer than it’s really meant to, because I’ve enjoyed his first two games I quite liked his form for WA in the U/18 Nationals last year. The major worry I have is that Knights seems to be a coach that likes to give players a taste at the top level and then drop them to Bendigo (Pears, Myers in 08, Zaharakis in 09, Howlett this year). Consider his stint in the seniors a bit of an experiment and I’d be surprised if he wasn’t back to the VFL in a few weeks after gaining some valuable experience.
Jake Melksham – Essendon ($121,500 MID, Break even: -27)
First two games: 57 vs. Carlton (W), 59 vs. West Coast (L) = 58 avg.
Like his similarly small framed teammate, job security will be a risk with any Essendon youngster that isn’t a freak of nature (see: Hurley). Melksham is a naturally inside player and he has remarkable poise for someone of his age. He’s just one of those players who always seems to have more time than you think, but isn’t necessarily quick (reminds me a bit of Pendlebury in that regard). However, with a small frame and an inside game I’d only be expecting him to play another 4-5 consecutive games at most. He’s a player I rate very highly, but I’m currently drafting a personal rule where I don’t take Essendon rookies. I’ll be watching the case study of Colyer and Melksham very closely after the unwarranted demotion of Howlett.
James Podsiadly – Geelong ($77,800 FWD, Break even: -143)
First two games: 85 vs. Freo (L), 115 vs. Port (W) = 100 avg.
Seriously, who doesn’t love this guy?! There’s something incredibly endearing about a guy that he made his debut at such a late age he’s actually starting to sprout a couple of grey hairs. And how has his form been? He’s kicked eight goals in his first two games and has been in better form than Mooney and Hawkins. Those who were sold on a downgrade to Rockliff this week have to be asking a few questions of themselves now. J-Pod (yep, I’m not ashamed to use such a lame nickname) is about $25K cheaper, has similar top end scoring potential and similar job security. Like Rocky if he keeps up this form he simply can’t be dropped. With their expected price booms it makes sense to trade in the forwards this week with Hitchcock and Gumbleton pretty close to maxed out on price and Roberts a total spud. Rocky vs. J-Pod will be a huge decision for many coaches this week.
Ben Stratton – Hawthorn ($89,500 DEF, Break even: -37)
First two games: 62 vs. Bulldogs (L), 41 vs. Collingwood (L) = 51.5 avg.
Out of all the guys ‘on the bubble’ that I’ve spoken about I rate Stratton’s job security the best, especially with Josh Gibson out for so long at Hawthorn. The 21 year old originally from East Perth is not a huge ball winner though. So you’re more looking at a guy with a fairly safe spot in the team, but more of an emergency type for your team. He’s not going to be one you rely on for big scores, but every now and then might bust out a 70 or so to pump up his price. If you missed on Maguire at the start of the year, I think Stratton is a pretty decent alternative before his price rises.
I would also like to thank Grimlock and FF Genie for the break even numbers. Don’t know what FF Genie is? Check out www.freewebs.com/ffgenie – top quality program!

17 Comments on Plenty On The Bubble…
Hitchcock -> Podsiadly is interesting this week (I already have Rockliff).
Profit. This trade would nett around $67000 and I’m wondering if that is worth a trade.
Price. Based on Hitchcock’s average of 48 and a best score of only 63 his peak price appears to be much lower than Podsiadly. $210k vs $400k+ (theoretically)
Job Security. With Mooney/Hawkins how secure is Podsiadly? Will Geelong continue to play with three talls? As you said, he is playing better than Mooney/Hawkins.
Overall I don’t think this is such a bad trade. I mean, the whole idea is to trade out rookies when they peak in price (or get close) for another rookie then trade in a keeper. Who says that the two trades have to be in the same week….I could just sit on the cash and wait. Thoughts?
• Ryan Bastinac or Mitch Duncan? (getting rid of ball)
• Leon Davis,Dane Swan, Brendon Goddard or Chris Judd? (getting rid of Armitage)
by the way t.rockcliff and j.pod have paid off picked them at the start
Dan, your thoughts on Ryan Hargrave please.
You have half the Bulldogs players in your team, but no Hargrave???
I am seriously considering a Hitchcock -> Pods trade this week. As noted Hitchcock probably wont progress much further and Pod’s is going to boom. He’s a better player than Hawkins.
Greg, nothing wrong with sitting on a bit of cash. I do it all the time. This week I’ll be going Walker to Rockliff and Roberts to Pods. As it is I’m already sitting on $121K but they’re hard to ignore and I’ve got to admit when I made mistakes – as I did with Roberts. Walker has been OK, but I think Pods and Rocky have better scoring potential and make me over $100K, so the trade makes sense.
Maanco, spewing I didn’t start either of Rocky or Pods. I had Franklin, who was missing Round 1, so was a bit limited, but I should’ve backed myself on Rocky. Hindsight is wonderful…
The ship has sailed on Bastinac and Duncan though. They’ve both had two price rises and have gone up by about $100K. I could never trade in a player who I only expect to average about 70 at a cost of $200K. That’s why I was cautious of Jordie McKenzie when I wrote about him a couple of weeks ago.
Tuney, I wanted to go a bit different in my backline so started Broughton over Hargrave. I’m looking very forward to DOWNGRADING Krakouer to Hargrave – who would’ve thought I’d be able to do that. I put Hargrave’s early form down to bad luck. Crook as a dog in Round 1, injured early in Round 3. Nothing to say he was 100% fit in Rounds 2 and 4 either given the way he’s been knocked around so far. Wait for a bit of form and pounce on his low price is what I’m doing.
I want to get peoples opinions on trading out a Ballantyne vs. Hitchcock for Pods. My aim is to get 22 ‘keepers’. Indulge me in these hypotheticals:
Ballantyne for Pods: Ballantyne has a big breakeven this week, so is set to drop in price. He’s at 267K, having made 25K profit. I trade for Pods (Bank +185K). Lets say Pods goes on to be worth 225K. I can now trade him for a 400K player.
Hitchcock for Pods: HC has made 50K in profit. Trade for Pods (Bank +66K). Pods goes on to 225K. I can now trade him for a player worth 275K and have a 220K-ish player on the bench in Ballantyne.
The second scenario nets you more slightly more overall dollar-profit (and a more reliable bench), however doesn’t line up with my goal: to have the best starting 22.
Thus I’m pretty sure I’m going to trade out Balla this week. I’d never earmarked him as a keeper anyways. Love some feedback on this strategy though :)
Having had Rockliff from the start, I’m giving up on Sam Wright and trading him down to Pods – the money I make will go in the bank towards my first upgrade in a couple of weeks time… Well that’s the plan anyway!
gumby –> pods trade a good idea you think?
Can’t trade roberts. i find it a waste of a trade and as bad as he is he should play more games.
I think with his efforts, Lucas is relatively secure in our 22 ATM. He has proved he has a good grab, and pretty good disposal as well as having defensive capabilities. The way he is playing he will play all of the remaining games. He will play a minimum of 12 games this year though. So a good downgrade target. Was hoping he wouldn’t debut til later in the year though…
Hey guys, need some help with my trades. My definate trade is dangerfield to rockliff. Then either Gumby or walker to pods or Mackay to swan. Is it bad downgrading 2 players in the forwards in the same week? These 2 seem like the real deal though. I would rather trade Gumby as i feel walker has a big score in him soon.
dan if i shouldnt down grade ball to duncan or Bastinac who should i trade him to
murphinator, i think the Hitch->Pods trade is a better one than Balla-> Pods. The reason behind this is i think Balla still has room for improvement. If we ignore his 1 bad game for the saints, then he has had a very good run already. And with Richmond and west coast next week, im certain he will bounce back. Gumby is hitting the Saints this wk, and i do not see him doing very well (or Port doing well for that matter!). Hope Gray does well…
Now i need your help, with Banner and Shuey on the bench, im thinking of keeping Shuey but trading Banner for K.Lucas as i dont see Banner getting games anymore with Hartlett ahead of him and the Port Adelaide midfield packed with Gray and Rodan recent inclusions. The only worry i have with Lucas is his job security as Bower and Mclean need to come in. Is this a waste of a trade or should i keep with Banner?
Gumbleton to pods, not Balla! :P
Lucas will NOT be dropped this week. He has performed well for us and he has bought himself at least two more weeks (provided he doesn’t cough up 10 goals this week – he won’t though, he is a cool head). It will be a disgrace if he does get dropped. I have him playing at a minimum 12+ games this season and wouldn’t surprise me if he played every round from now on.
Armfield is most likely to be dropped for Bower. As for the Mclean inclusion – it is a tricky one. Someone has to make way and i’m not sure who..maybe Robinson for a stint in the vfl to regain confidence. Hard luck story if they’re both up this weekend
Maanco, check out cunnington from north. He should debut this week and is a dt jet! If he is named, he is who u want! Would not be surprised if he averages 80ish! Big ball winner and loves to tackle! The prob with the other two u named is that they are nearly maxing out…
Personally I am tempted by a few trades this week- I started pods and rockliff, so that is not my issue. I am contemplating downgrading maguire or hunt to Ashton hams. I really liked his preseason and his wafl form has been great! Look for him to get time in the midfield with the loss of kerr!! With the money I want hall to Sylvia, Martin to Hayes and hille to cox…
Ps. Banking money ain’t a bad thing! I currently have $250k in the bank from past trading!
And I’m unsure if people are aware, shuey is injured and will be out for 2-3 weeks
Is it true that when mitch brown comes off the injury list pods cant play as he is a rookie?
Good point dtmaster and yes, that’s true. Mitch Brown (the Geelong version obviously) is 2-3 weeks away. The rule is as soon as he’s back playing any football he’s off the long term injured list, which means Pods has to go back to the rookie list.
This year there is a new rule though where each club can promote a player after Round 11 whether or not they have an LTI. If Pods’ form is still good I reckon Brown’s return might be more like 3-4 away (I’m implying that Geelong ‘err on the side of caution’ to keep Pods getting games). So Pods would still be missing three or four games. He’ll definitely be back on the senior list after Round 11.
Was Motlop put on LTI for Geelong? Did i hear that correctly?
Hmmm, I forgot about Motlop, but he isn’t showing up on the Geelong injured list this week, but last week he was down as 12 weeks. I’m about 90% sure this means Pods can stay up. He was initially promoted for Brown’s injury, but if there’s another LTI at the time Brown comes back he can just shuffle across and take that blokes spot (Motlop in this case).
I actually hadn’t heard that Geelong put Motlop on the LTI, but he qualifies and it’d make sense with Pods playing so well.
Leave a comment on Plenty On The Bubble…
You must be logged in to post a comment.
RSS feed for comments on this post · TrackBack URI